Introduction
It is hard to believe
that the iconic and beloved Swedish brand, IKEA, burst onto the U.S. market
back in 1985. Incredibly, for all the success that IKEA has experienced
worldwide, there are only 40 stores in the U.S. If you have the opportunity to
visit an IKEA store, it is quite an experience. The store consists of a maze of
departments and floors that are interconnected on color coded paths that seems
endless when steering the peculiar shopping carts that have a mind of their
own.
In 2015, IKEA enjoyed a 11.5 percent
increase in business with worldwide sales of an astounding 31.5 billion euros. IKEA
was built on a brick and mortar model that caters to the up and coming millennial
target market, but it’s mission is to strive for great design, quality and
affordability for all. The prices are so affordable, that regardless if you
need it or not, it is almost guaranteed that when visiting the store, you will most
likely leave the store with something.
Opportunities
For a brand that was founded in
1943 and has become a trailblazer in the affordable home furniture and
furnishings sector, they appear to have been asleep at the wheel when it came
to online shopping. "We weren’t one of the early adapters. But
we’ve matured in our thinking about it," Peter Agnefjall, IKEA’s chief
executive, said in an interview with Fast Company. "We realized this is
not a trend, it’s a mega shift." Incongruously, they
are proud to boast in the end of year report of 2015, that there were 1.9
billion visits to the IKEA.com website, but does not specify the online channel
sales, only to say there was a 21 percent increase over 2014.
The loss of
potential revenue over this missed opportunity is staggering. For example, if a mere half of one percent of
the 1.9 billion visitors converted into a sale of $30, this would equal $285
million in revenue. IKEA has about 70
percent of the products available online and the goal is to list about 90
percent. One might think, especially if you have visited the brick and mortar
store that it is understandable, when developing an online strategy for more
than 9,500 products, for this to be viewed as challenging. However, when
compared to Amazon, the king of ecommerce sites, which has 488 million product
offerings, and a direct competitor to IKEA, Overstock.com, which also solely
lives in the online space has more than 1 million products listed. Being slow
on the uptake, IKEA began placing an emphasis with online sales in the U.S. only
about 5 years ago and saw an increase of 35 percent from the previous year.
Pros and Cons of the Website
Visiting the IKEA website is a
brutal undertaking and not for the faint of heart because of the awkwardness of
the user experience. The so-called “Swedish Theme Park” has not successfully
transferred online into an enjoyable visit. The photos are beautiful and visually
appealing, but products are represented as a virtual pdf catalog. Speaking of
the catalog, although IKEA has developed an admirable sustainability plan, it
continues to kill trees by printing 200 million copies of the catalog in 27
languages for 38 countries. It is a beautiful tactile look book with
a long shelf life, which has proven highly effective as a low tech tool.
However, instead of transferring the book to an online interactive experience
the products online are one dimensional, difficult to navigate and very
confusing with core design and information hierarchy. Some
basic considerations are for IKEA to provide better search results based on the
users’ query construction. In fact, the
catalog, that continues as a marketing centerpiece, was mocked by the IKEA marketing
team in a video poking fun at shoppers who flock to look and browse online by
calling it a catalog “bookbook.” It’s clever but obviously out of touch.
Clearly, IKEA made a huge
miscalculation by recognizing how shoppers’ behaviors have changed and consumers
use the web to research and compare prices, but more importantly to buy.
Furthermore, IKEA ignored that time is a precious commodity and shoppers who may
love the IKEA products, but lack time were willing to pay for add-ons such as delivery
and assembly of furniture. Which gives one pause that the online challenges may
be a combination of a cultural disconnect and a lack of dedicated resources. One
bright light is the development of an online catalog app with 54 million visits
and an interactive kitchen design tool, albeit clumsy, but certainly a move in
the right direction of embracing technology. Both of these are
indications that the brand is slowly shifting. For IKEA this is groundbreaking!
Examining the Website
The IKEA brand is a well-known name
where a large segment of customers includes the iconic name in the search bar.
This was confirmed when using the SemRush analytic tool, that at a minimum 30
percent of the website traffic organically comes from the iconic brand keyword.
What this means is that if a shopper is looking for a dining chair, more
popular search results will appear with brands such as Pottery Barn, West Elm,
Wayfair and Overstock.com, who lead online furniture sales and dominate with 42percent online. Let’s look at a website SEO audit and examine
the pitfalls.
Using the analytical tool WebRanks,
the IKEA website landed a grade of “D” for search engine optimization, which is
pretty poor for a well-known brand. Let’s look at individual elements that
contribute to this low grade in the SEO report and for this case study it is
useful to use a comparison tool for IKEA and its competition. Using the
side-by-side comparison tool by Internet Marketing Ninjas the finding was as
follows:
Head Tag Elements:
IKEA missed the boat completely by
having this element void of information.
According to Moz, the title head tag element is used to provide an
accurate and concise description of the page’s content, which is crucial to the
user experience and SEO. The title tag creates value in relevancy, browsing and
the search engine results page. The optimal format is primary keyword,
secondary keyword and brand name. If we use this rule, it looks like West Elm
is the only one who followed the suggestion. The rule of thumb is
that the title tag should be no more than 7 words and less than 62 characters.
Meta Description:
The suggested character length of
the meta description is between 150-160 characters. Clearly, IKEA hasn’t taken
advantage of this prime opportunity to advertise content by using unique
relevancy of keywords. Fleishner suggests using the keyword twice
in the meta description, which will have a direct impact on the SERP and
improves click-through rates.
Meta Keywords:
In 2009, Google decided to quit
using keyword meta tags in the search engine results and this is a result of
black hat tactics of keyword overstuffing.
Although meta keywords have no relevance they can expose keyword
strategy to competitors. Therefore, it is best to use the Google guidelines
when selecting these words.
Headings:
The rules are to include key words
in the heading tags and the content with 1 to 3 being adequate. As we can see
by the analysis below, IKEA does the bare minimum. These tags are important to
emphasize text on the web page. IKEA has zero H1 tags and 1 H2 tags.
Brand
|
Internal
Links
|
Page
Text
|
Page
Speed
|
IKEA
|
148
|
598
|
1950 ms
|
Overstock
|
649
|
1825
|
1899
ms
|
Wayfair
|
517
|
1188
|
9391 ms
|
West
Elm
|
453
|
1544
|
23860
ms
|
Internal Links:
IKEA falls short on the internal
links as demonstrated in the chart above. Internal links are useful as they
allow users to navigate a website, help establish hierarchy and help spread the
ranking power around the website. By creating internal links, it gives direct
access to different pages by order of importance. Obviously, IKEA
needs help in this area because when searching on the website for a simple product
item the results are overwhelming. What this means is the hierarchy has not
been properly established. Another missed opportunity for IKEA.
Page Text:
Not sure what IKEA is thinking with
regard to page text and is clearly outnumbered when compared to its
competitors. Page text general rules are to use the keywords more in the front
end and avoid keyword stuffing, if done properly this will avoid being
penalized during the search results…another missed opportunity
for IKEA.
Page Speed:
The load speed of a web
page directly affects the search engine page results. Google places a high
importance on the user experience and if the web page takes too long to load,
it is understandable that the user will most likely move on. “According to surveys, nearly
half of web users expect a site to load in 2 seconds or less, and they tend to
abandon a site that isn’t loaded within 3 seconds. 79%
of web shoppers who have trouble with web site performance say they won’t
return to the site to buy again and around 44% of them would tell a friend if
they had a poor experience shopping online."
Alt Image:
Alt images, otherwise known as
image tags is what is displayed when the image cannot be displayed or is
present while the page is loading. Google cannot read an image and therefore
all images should have text that matches the relevance of the image and contain
150 characters or less. The text, which often includes keywords, sends a signal
to the search engine that the page is relevant and consequently ranks higher. Tagging the images can only help during the search engine process. When conducting the evaluation of the IKEA website, there were 170 images and surprisingly
none had alt image tags. This is another missed opportunity.
Take Away
In conclusion, this evaluation has
demonstrated many areas of improvement where the IKEA website still needs work.
The U.S. consumer is patiently waiting, with high hopes, that it will turn things
around quickly because the downside is obvious lost revenue. There are other
opportunities that were not discussed that pertains to social buttons for
sharing and creating and linking relevant content all of which increase search
results. There are insights into a new Live Catalog webpage that appear to have
some promising results, but the real question is can they catch up in time?